;)

;)

Friday, August 28, 2015

Mexico warns Texas not to refuse its immigrants' babies U.S. birth certificates | Fox News Latino

http://latino.foxnews.com/latino/news/2015/08/27/mexico-warns-texas-not-to-refuse-its-babies-usbirth-certificates/

It's gonna hurt the relationship between Texas and Mexico ??? What are they gonna have there people sneak in through a different state ???
..................... FUCK MEXICO......................

3 comments:

  1. ‘‘This amendment which I have offered is simply declaratory of what I regard as the law of the land already, that every person born within the limits of the United States, and subject to their jurisdiction, is by natural law and national law, a citizen of the United States. This will not, of course, include persons born in the US who are foreigners, aliens, who belong to the families of embassadors or ministers accredited to the United States, but will include every other class of persons.” Senator Howard, sponsor of the 14th Amendment, Congressional Globe, 1st session 39th Congress, 1866, Pg. 2890.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well, Mick, we agree on one thing !!! The 14th was for the black population that was born here as slaves, American Indians went to court to try to get citizenship and were denied because their aliance was to their tribe, not the US of A.......

      Delete
  2. Yes, that was Elk v. Wilkins, The reason why Indians and Ambassadors children are forbidden to be US Citizens is because they are foreigners and have allegiance to a foreign nation--- same with aliens who have children in the US. Incidentally "national law and natural law" is law of nations, i.e Original Common Law, which defines the term of art natural born Citizen. Senator John Bingham , in that same section of the Congressional Globe, defines natural born Citizen the same as Original Common Law, as one born in the country of parents who are it's citizens (because if born in the country, of a foreign father, it will only be a place of birth and not his country). I took a case all the way to the SCOTUS and watched the black robed thugs lie right to my face in the lower courts, challenging Obama's eligibility (he was born British, of a British subject father). They would not hear it at SCOTUS-- which is how they shut you down.
    I wrote this a while back and it appeared on a blog called the Steady Drip.

    https://www.scribd.com/doc/98909804/Proof-That-the-Congressional-Research-Service-is-Not

    I would be happy to write something about the eligibility of Rubio Cruz and Jindal,for your blog and why they are not who you think they are. I plan on challenging them in Florida in December.If you are truly a Constitutionalist you need to take the blinders off, and seriously understand the Constitutional question involved. Cruz was naturalized at birth by 8 US Code 1401(g)--- a naturalization statute. Natural born Citizens, born of US Citizen parents in the US, need no naturalization. The well known purpose of the natural born Citizen requirement is prevention of foreign influence-- so it is impossible that the children of foreigners is eligible, Cruz, Rubio and Jindal were all born of non US Citizen parents-- they are protecting Obama.
    And just so you know, John McCain was not eligible either (he was born in the Panama Canal Zone, and naturalized by 8 US Code 1403). It was important for the Globalists to have an illegal POTUS-- so we had the choice of 2 illegal candidates, Now they seek to cement the precedent of Obama with more illegal candidates from the Republican side.

    ReplyDelete

Let me know how I'm doing, as long as your not a fucking liberal who believes that a little fairy dust will solve all the worlds ills .......;)